
Aviation Security Forum Update — August 10, 2008
Feds Talk FFDO Issues with Pilots
Three officials
from the Flight Programs Division of the Federal Air
Marshal Service (FAMS) talked candidly about ongoing
issues involving the Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO)
program with pilots attending ALPA’s Aviation Security
Form (AvSec) in Washington, D.C. this week.
Richard Bert,
Special Agent in Charge, told the group—more than half
of whom were FFDOs, “Our hats are off to you for your
dedication and service. You far outnumber the FAMs. You
provide a randomness across the country that keeps the
adversary off-balance—he doesn’t know if an FFDO is on
the flight.”
Bert warned
pilots that
-
they can be
dismissed from the FFDO program for trying to use
their FFDO to get through the LEO security screening
lane (the TSA fires FAMS and transportation security
officers who do that);
-
the TSA can
fine an FFDO as much as $2,500 for inadvertently
bringing an undeclared FFDO pistol to a security
screening checkpoint, which has happened when the
FFDO forgot the weapon was in a particular bag;
-
that FFDOs only
have until the end of August to get their
credentials renewed, and that old creds will be void
after October 1, and
-
keeping TSA
informed of their flight schedule—both on and off
mission status—is vitally important.
Proceeding
directly to current FFDO issues, Bert noted, “This
spring, we had an accidental discharge in an airliner
cockpit—not good. The pilot has been fired. We in the
Flight Programs Division have been criticized for not
coming to his defense. We are taking a neutral position;
we are talking to the airline, the pilot, and his
attorney.
“Whenever you
deviate from the SOPs, you put yourself at risk. The
SOPs are there for a reason. When you follow the SOPs,
we back you up.”
“Please tell us
about your missions,” Bert said. “For one thing, it’s
good for the program stats. The downside of the FFDO
program is, we can’t dictate where you fly, whereas we
assign flights to the FAMs. So we don’t know where you
are, and when, unless you tell us.
“Not just the
stats are important,” Bert continued. “If an event
happens, cell phones light up all over Washington. One
of the questions always is, Are any FFDOs on board? The
answer makes a big difference to the folks who scramble
the fighters. So please, keep us informed about your
schedule—you can use the Dashboard for that.”
Bert told a
story about an FFDO who flew into the United Kingdom
with forgotten ammo in his flight bag. When he
discovered it, he hid it in the hotel room—but a maid
found it, and alerted the authorities. “The bobbies were
hot on his trail,” Bert said. “We asked the Brits to
stand down, and they did.”
Bert said the
FFDO program budget has been flat the last couple of
years and is expected to stay flat. In the future, he
added, the number of new FFDOs trained each year may
shrink by more than half, as more of the budget will
spent on maintaining the program.
“[TSA
Administrator] Kip Hawley is a strong advocate of the
program,” he reminded the AvSec attendees, “but budget
mandates come down from higher up in the federal
government.”
TSA is
continuing to work on providing FFDOs with the
opportunity for extended carry. “I don’t think your
authority will change,” Bert said, “but we’re looking at
all the actual steps involved in complying with our
current FFDO SOPs, and we realize that some of them are
very cumbersome. What can be fixed—equipment?
procedures? policy? We’re trying to find a better way
than what we have now.”
Bert cautioned,
“In 2009, we’re going to have a large block of FFDOs who
will need to go through recurrent training and their
five-year background check. Please don’t wait until the
last minute to get your picture taken and get this
done.”
He added, “When you see a problem with boarding
procedures, please let us know via the Dashboard.”
Regarding a new
element of FFDO training—behavior detection—Bert said,
“You can learn a lot from just talking to a person for a
few minutes. We’re looking to train you and the flight
attendants on behavior detection.”
During a Q&A
session, a pilot said, “We have a lot of FFDOs
deadheading in the cabin—but the FFDOs’ jurisdiction
doesn’t extend beyond the cockpit. If something bad goes
down in the cabin—a Level 3 or 4 security event—what are
we supposed to do?”
Bert replied,
“When you’re in the cabin, you’re just a John Doe
passenger. But we’ve given you the training to recognize
a threat, to know what the proper response to the threat
is, and how to deliver that response. You have to use
your own discretion.”
Ron Phifer,
Deputy Special Agent in Charge, added, “We’ll never ask
you to sit on your hands in the back of an airplane. As
a citizen, you can defend yourself by any means
necessary. But we have the SOPs: If FAMs are aboard,
give us a chance to defend the cockpit—that’s our job.
Again, we can’t overstress the importance of keeping us
informed of your schedule—whether you’re on mission
status or deadheading.”
Mike Keane,
Deputy Chief, responding to a question about FFDOs’
potential exposure to liability in civil suits, said, “I
strongly recommend you look into buying your own
professional liability insurance.
A pilot
attending as a representative of the International
Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations (IFALPA)
asked, regarding the United States inking agreements
with other countries to permit FFDOs serving on
international flights, “Have you looked at possible
problems of diverting to a third country?”
Bert answered,
“You’ve just identified half the problem—but we’re
working on it.”
He added, “We’ve
dealt with cases in which an FFDO inadvertently ended up
in Canada with his or her weapon. The Canadians don’t
like us taking weapons into their country.”
F/O Greg Bergner
(ASTAR) pointed out that, in the all-cargo world,
training on Common Strategy is recommended, but not
required, so often is not provided. Bert responded,
“That’s a good point. We’ll take that as a takeaway and
talk to the training people about it.”
Jim Andresakes,
ALPA Aviation Security supervisor, pointed out that when cargo
pilot FFDOs are in passenger airliner jumpseats, they
often have a different concept of Common Strategy than
the passenger pilots have.
F/O Mark Ingram
(Continental) recommended permitting an FFDO on a
cockpit jumpseat to be allowed to be on mission status.
A pilot told an
anecdote about flying on flights when as many as seven
guns were in the cabin but not known to the flight crew.
Keane responded that such an event would be highly
unusual, that several mistakes would have to be made for
such a situation to occur, and that this is why the FAMS
developed the existing SOPs. He, Phifer, and Capt. Bob
Hesselbein all urged pilots to document and report
security problems. As Hesselbein put it, “facts need to
be documented, or they’re just hearsay.” |